The Evolution of European Social Work in the 20th Century

The twentieth century transformed European social work beyond recognition. From the ashes of World War II emerged comprehensive welfare systems designed to protect citizens from poverty, illness, and unemployment. Yet these same systems would face profound challenges as feminist and anti-racist activists exposed their biases, conservative governments questioned their foundations, and globalization reshaped the economic landscape. Understanding this evolution reveals how social work adapted to meet changing social needs while grappling with fundamental questions about equality, responsibility, and the role of the state.

Building the welfare state after World War II 🔗

The devastation of World War II created an urgent need for government action. The war generated new welfare constituencies including disabled veterans, surviving dependents of killed servicemen, and war refugees, forcing European governments to expand social protection dramatically. Between 1945 and 1980, social spending increased across Western Europe as nations rebuilt their societies.

The war’s impact extended beyond immediate needs. Mass warfare enhanced state capacities, furnished governments with new fiscal powers, propelled democratization, and strengthened the power of labor movements. These political and institutional changes created conditions that supported welfare state expansion for decades.

Different European countries developed distinct welfare models. The Nordic countries focused on universal income guarantees and comprehensive services, while Mediterranean nations developed fragmented systems with generous pensions but gaps in other areas. Despite these variations, most Western European nations shared a commitment to comprehensive social protection including healthcare, education, housing, unemployment insurance, and retirement pensions.

The golden age of social protection 🔗

From the 1950s through the early 1970s, Western Europe experienced unprecedented economic growth and social progress. Welfare expenditure became the largest component of public spending, with people engaged in welfare activities forming the largest body of public employees. Social workers found themselves at the center of expanding services designed to ensure decent living standards for all citizens.

This period established social work as a professional field grounded in rights-based approaches. Universal healthcare systems, free education, subsidized housing, and comprehensive unemployment benefits became standard features across much of Western Europe, fundamentally changing the relationship between citizens and the state.

Feminist and anti-racist critiques emerge 🔗

As welfare states matured, activists began exposing their limitations. Feminist scholars and practitioners challenged how these systems perpetuated gender inequality. In Southern European countries under authoritarian control, much responsibility for welfare fell upon unpaid women, with family benefits costing only a fraction of what Northern European countries spent.

The mainstream feminist movement of the 1960s and 1970s initially focused on the experiences of middle-class white women, often overlooking how race and class intersected with gender. White feminists often failed to understand racism and anti-Semitism, with some claiming that migrant or Muslim men were the main culprits of sexism. This approach legitimized racism while denying the experiences of migrant women and women of color.

Developing intersectional approaches 🔗

Women of color took the lead in advocating for perspectives that recognized multiple forms of oppression. Women of color became the primary voices advocating for a racial perspective in the feminist movement and a gendered perspective in the anti-racism movement. They understood that fighting for equality required addressing race, gender, and class simultaneously rather than treating these issues separately.

Social work slowly began incorporating these insights, though progress remained uneven. Anti-racist practice emerged to expose the bases of power in society and the processes reproducing inequalities, challenging social work’s traditional emphasis on individual casework. This shift recognized that personal problems often stemmed from structural inequalities rather than individual failings.

The Thatcher era and New Right ideology 🔗

The 1980s brought a fundamental challenge to European welfare states. In Britain, Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher championed what became known as the New Right, an ideology emphasizing free markets, individual responsibility, and reduced government intervention. Thatcher called for greater independence of the individual from the state, advocating privatization of state-owned enterprises and tight controls on public spending.

These policies had profound implications for social work. The New Right viewed poverty as the result of individual moral failings rather than structural inequality. This perspective fundamentally contradicted social work’s developing understanding of how systemic factors shaped individual circumstances.

Shifting from welfare to workfare 🔗

Thatcher’s government replaced relatively unrestricted unemployment benefits with a jobseekers’ allowance requiring applicants to actively seek work and undergo training. The focus shifted from providing comprehensive social protection to encouraging individual self-reliance and market participation.

Social workers found themselves implementing policies that emphasized individual responsibility over collective support. Benefits were reduced and means-testing expanded, leaving many families who received benefits significantly poorer. The goal of creating a “property-owning democracy” prioritized home ownership over social housing, fundamentally changing the landscape of social provision.

These changes extended beyond Britain. Similar New Right policies influenced conservative governments across Europe, challenging the post-war consensus on welfare state responsibilities and reshaping social work practice throughout the continent.

Globalization transforms welfare states 🔗

By the late twentieth century, European welfare states faced a new challenge: globalization. The influence of globalization on social expenditure varied across welfare models in intensity, with Nordic countries showing more intense reactions in areas like active labor market policies and housing. International economic integration, capital mobility, and technological change created pressures that affected social work practice across borders.

Globalization raised questions about whether welfare states could maintain comprehensive social protection in an interconnected world economy. Some predicted permanent retrenchment, while others argued that welfare states could adapt to new economic realities.

European integration and social policy 🔗

Since 2000, the European Union increased its influence on social protection, with initiatives like the European Pillar of Social Rights providing a compass for updating labor markets and welfare states. However, the gradual integration of European economies meant that economic crises in one country increasingly affected others, complicating national welfare policies.

Social workers navigated these changes while addressing new challenges. The EU introduced instruments like the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund and Youth Guarantee to address unemployment and social risks created by global economic restructuring. These programs reflected recognition that national welfare states alone could not address challenges created by international economic forces.

The tension between national welfare traditions and supranational economic integration continues to shape European social work. As populations age, migration increases, and economic uncertainty persists, social workers must balance competing demands for fiscal discipline and adequate social protection.

What do you think? How can social work practice honor the insights of feminist and anti-racist critiques while adapting to economic pressures from globalization? In what ways should European welfare states evolve to meet twenty-first century challenges while preserving their commitment to social protection?

References

1. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2018/05/17/the-legacy-of-world-war-ii-on-social-spending-in-the-western-world/
2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_social_model
3. https://academic.oup.com/book/44645/chapter/378692936
4. https://www.encyclopedia.com/history/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/welfare-state-0
5. https://www.uoc.edu/en/news/2021/037-stefanie-mayer
6. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feminism_and_racism
7. https://www.thesocialworkgraduate.com/post/anti-racism
8. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thatcherism
9. https://www.transformingsociety.co.uk/2021/01/29/more-thatcherite-than-thatcher-understanding-uk-welfare-and-penal-policy-today/
10. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5794812/
11. https://academic.oup.com/cje/article/44/2/319/5550923
12. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8604703/
13. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-1-137-09783-5
14. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2022/698916/EPRS_STU(2022)698916_EN.pdf
15. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/spol.12979